Right results, ready for any audit.
You know what a wrong number costs: the run goes back to the bench, the client questions the report, and the auditor wants to know where it came from. Gerencialab closes that door. The analyst enters what they measured and the result comes out calculated, checked and traceable, from intake to the signed report. You deliver faster, redo less, and walk into the audit with the story of every result ready.
The right method already sits behind every analysis.
The analyst sees only the reading fields and enters what they measured. Your own validated method does the calculation underneath, with nothing to reprogram and no calls to IT.
No calculator on the bench, and no math slips.
The analyst enters the reading, clicks Calculate and the result comes out on the spot, calculated by the right method. No risk of a math error in the rush, no asking a colleague how the formula went again.
Samples in the same batch run together, not scattered.
Group samples that run in the same analytical batch and see everything together on screen. The batch sheet shows the whole consolidated view, with nothing scattered across tabs.
The system knows which reagent went into each result.
At analysis time you choose which reagent lot to use, and the system suggests by FEFO (first to expire goes out first). Which reagent went into each result? The system shows it, with expiry date and certificate. When the auditor asks, you have the answer.
Equipment results upload by file, with no retyping.
Export from the instrument, upload the file and the system loads the reading. No retyping line by line, no missing a decimal place copying from the display.
Every reading keeps the instrument that measured it.
The system keeps which instrument produced each result. If an instrument has a problem later, you know exactly which analyses to review.
Method changed? You adjust and move on, no ticket.
When the method changes, the calculation keeps up right away and the team carries on. No waiting for someone to reprogram the system before results can go out again.
Where the math error usually slips in (and how it stops here)
Most wrong results do not come from bad measurement. They come from the step between the reading and the final number.
Transcribing the display onto paper.
The analyst does not copy the number by hand into the wrong place. The reading enters the form linked to the right sample.
A formula recalled from memory.
Nobody applies the equation from memory. The calculation runs through the validated method, the same every time.
A reagent with no trace.
The lot used is recorded on the result, with expiry and certificate. An expired reagent does not slip past unnoticed.
Analysis does not work alone here
The strength is not only in the right math. It is that the analysis is one stage of a system that runs the whole lab, from intake to the signed report.
From intake to report, one system.
The sample that arrives at reception is the same one that becomes a result and a signed report. No exporting data from one stage to the next, no reconciling versions.
Quality control judges the run on its own.
Log the control and the system says whether it accepts, warns or rejects, with Levey-Jennings and Westgard. The result comes out with QC right beside it.
The report comes out signed, legally valid.
The result becomes a report with an ICP-Brasil signature and a public portal for the client to verify. Delivery closes inside the same system.
Traceability ready for 17025.
From collection to report, the sample's trail is laid out as a tree. When the auditor asks for the story, it is already there.
Frequently asked questions
Does it fit the kind of analysis my lab runs?
It fits testing and analysis labs across any matrix: water, effluent, soil, food, environmental. The method is yours; the system organizes the analysis, the quality control and the report around it.
Do I have to recreate my methods' formulas in the system?
No. The system uses the calculation from your own validated method, with nothing to reprogram. The analyst sees only the reading fields and the result comes out ready.
Does the system read results straight from the instrument?
By file, yes: you export from the instrument and import here. Live serial capture, with the instrument wired to the port in real time, is not part of the current version.
How do I know which reagent was used in each analysis?
The chosen lot is recorded on the result, with expiry and certificate. The system also suggests the lot by FEFO, first to expire first out.
Can I process several samples in the same batch?
You can. You group the samples that run in the same analytical batch, and the batch sheet shows it all consolidated, with nothing scattered across tabs.
Want to see the LIMS running with your lab's routine?
Book a demo and see it with your own data: the sample comes in by scanner, the QC comes back evaluated, the report comes out signed. No promises, you watch it work.